• Employment Law Lawyers Twitter
  • Click to Rate Our Law Firms

    Disclaimer

    THE MATERIALS ON THIS WEB SITE ARE PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, DO NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE, do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Diefer Law Group, P.C. or any of its attorneys or clients, and are not guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up-to-date.

    THIS WEB SITE IS NOT INTENDED TO CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN YOU AND DIEFER LAW GROUP, P.C. AND YOU SHOULD NOT ACT OR RELY ON ANY INFORMATION IN THIS WEB SITE WITHOUT SEEKING THE ADVICE OF AN ATTORNEY. Please note that no attorney-client relationship is created with Diefer Law Group, P.C. or any of its attorneys absent an EXPRESS WRITTEN AGREEMENT between the firm and the client. The mere receipt by the firm of an email does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please also note that the Statute of Limitations (the deadline imposed by law within which you may bring a lawsuit) may severely limit the time remaining for you to file any potential claims you may have.  To the extent this web site contains information indicating results that either we have achieved for our clients, or results of other cases as posted by the Los Angeles Daily Journal, these past results do not guarantee future results.  More specifically, the results shown in the section entitled “Recent Verdicts and Settlements” represent cases as reported in the Los Angeles Daily Journal and do not reflect outcomes obtained by Diefer Law Group, P.C. nor do they represent a guarantee of future results .

    NEWS FROM OUR BLOG

    One Giant Leap for All-Kinds
    Luis Patino, a seventy-two year-old machinist at Birken Manufacturing Co., in Bloomfield Connecticut, was affronted by co-workers and subjected to anti-gay slurs for nearly thirteen years, despite the fact the he was “one of [the company’s best machinists”. During his employment, Patino filed five complaints, informing company officials and the state Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO) of the severe mistreatment he was he receiving. ... continue reading

    RECENT VERDICTS

    • A 36-year old female, claimed she was sexually harassed by her supervisor, a long term employee, for a period of one year... Result: Jury verdict in favor of Plaintiff for $432,500.00 ... read more
    • Restaurant workers, sued their former employer, restaurant owners, for unpaid overtime and minimum wage violations... Result: $168,015 bench decision in favor of plaintiff. ... read more
    • Manager for a nationwide company that rents electronics, complained of inappropriate behavior by his supervisor regarding the treatment of women... Result: $1,619,000 verdict in favor of plaintiff. ... read more
    • Female, sued her City employer for gender discrimination, harassment and retaliation... Result: $175,000 settlement in favor of plaintiff.... read more
    • Age 54, sued her former employer after she was terminated for absences caused by her medical conditions... Result: $19,014,000 verdict in favor of plaintiff... read more
    read all recent verdicts

    CONTACT US

    Answer the following question:
    1+5 

    We will only use this contact information for a one-time consultation unless you request otherwise.